User:Rmhermen
 | This user has been editing Wikipedia for more than ten years. |
Admin
[edit]I am a Wikipedia:administrator since July 5, 2004. I first contributed to Wikipedia in April of 2001 (oldest edits lost in early software upgrades). My first edit with my username appears to be on April 26. I have been active on a number of online projects - active and passive (SETI@Home, Distributed Proofreaders, Mars crater labeling, Stardust@Home, Folding@Home on the Wikipedia team: Team page, etc.)
| Action | Count |
|---|---|
| Edits | 61501 |
| Edits+Deleted | 64858 |
| Pages deleted | 3958 |
| Revisions deleted | 14 |
| Pages restored | 30 |
| Pages protected | 80 |
| Pages unprotected | 9 |
| Protections modified | 23 |
| Users blocked | 101 |
| Users reblocked | 1 |
| User rights modified | 1 |
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- SecretSoySauce (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:46, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. PhilKnight (talk) 20:08, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- 147.161.165.6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:42, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Not Mid Atlantic Baby. PhilKnight (talk) 20:49, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 216.93.142.116 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – 3RR violation Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Filmssssssssssss: - 3RR on which article? Are you sure? PhilKnight (talk) 21:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- After reviewing, this report is a mistake. Sorry about that Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:33, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Macbook01 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Billy Long: vandalism after final warning; account is being used only for promotional purposes. Repeated edit warring, original research and promotional editing, with a possible COI based on an edit summary for an edit on another article where they stated they worked for the government. R0paire 22:08, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2A06:5904:3201:1100:5DE3:9080:DEF7:7F7F (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Want U Back: vandalism after final warning. Ban evasion by User:MariaJaydHicky. Binksternet (talk) 22:22, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- 24.126.58.228 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. Cabrils (talk) 22:27, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- IceAgeCollisionCourse1046 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Mypersonalblogg21 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Bheem Insane (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "insane|psychopath|criminal" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ackiller21 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "killer" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 10:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Awanirecords (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- DanielMoradOfficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Hawktuahshhsuh (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Wkieditorlikedeerandchicken32e23 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)- This username matched "long username without spaces" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
User has vandalized. This may be a vandalism only account. / RemoveRedSky [talk] 20:46, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Світлана Пукас (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:40, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "Attempting to skip filters using multiple similar characters" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:40, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Multiple special characters can be contained in the same phrase, this rule detects when one or more occurs. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:40, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- BehindEveryLaughTheresAClown (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Dsadjkahrbfjidjnjj (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Only edit is vandalism. Chris ☁️(talk - contribs) 11:24, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Pornoman123 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Wiiformii (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- VistaEP-37 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username Sophisticatedevening (talk) 19:31, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Frequent IP vandalism, more on the way Sushidude21! (talk) 11:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:42, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP edit warring. Boardwalk.Koi (talk) 11:50, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- The IP in question is also a sockpuppet - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Holiptholipt/Archive and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Holiptholipt. Brat Forelli🦊 14:41, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2800:2503:0:0:0:0:0:0/39 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ponyo. for a month. Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Socks repeatedly copying all the reviews of movies he has appeared in - has been going on for months Arjayay (talk) 12:13, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 49.205.118.4 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 19:52, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. IP keeps changing things like commas and making insulting edit summaries. Ermenrich (talk) 13:00, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. I have given them a level 3 warning over their edit summaries. Daniel Case (talk) 20:04, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Urgent Request for Protection for the Wikipedia Page of Espérance Sportive de Tunis
[edit]Reason: Dear Wikipedia Administrators,
I am writing to request a protection of the Wikipedia page of Espérance Sportive de Tunis, particularly due to the anticipated surge in global attention surrounding the club's participation in the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup in the USA, which will take place in June 2025.
As the club will be competing in this prestigious event, it is expected that there will be a significant increase in traffic to the page. Unfortunately, this may also lead to attempts to introduce false claims, misinformation, and vandalism. Given the importance of maintaining accurate and reliable content, I believe it is essential to safeguard the page from such disruptions.
Therefore, I respectfully request that the page be any protection you see fit for a reasonable duration before and after the event to preserve the integrity of the article. This will ensure that all information on the page remains correct and that readers receive reliable details about the club during a period of heightened interest.
Thank you for considering this request. I trust that the protection will help maintain the page’s accuracy and reliability, especially at this critical time.
Best regards, Mejri Fares (talk) 13:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:28, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) I don't think this should be protected per WP:PREEMPTIVE, and there isn't much vandalism on that page. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 14:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. As noted above. Daniel Case (talk) 20:04, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive editing & addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 14:15, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:34, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – It's been over three months since Al-Kaf's controversial ruling in the World Cup Qualifiers, and unregistered users (the majority of which are from Indonesia) have still been vandalizing his page. Call me paranoid, but I believe the page should be indefinitely semi-protected. OpalYosutebito (talk) 14:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:18, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We'll see if vandalism is still an issue after the third round of the AFC World Cup Qualifiers are over. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:19, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Myrealnamm's Alternate Account (talk) 14:53, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:38, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. For at least 3 weeks. Out of precaution, admittedly, since the Chiefs (and the Eagles) are heading to Super Bowl LIX. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 14:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A day or so ago this might have been justified, but that dispute seems to have cooled. And "Out of precaution, admittedly" is basically a request for pre-emptive protection, which outside of certain situations in ArbCom cases we don't grant. Daniel Case (talk) 22:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nonstop vandalism despite pending changes. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 2804:7F0:96C2:C000:0:0:0:0/50 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 22:52, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently announced album article, target of IP vandals continuously changing chronology convention. —IB [ Poke ] 16:28, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. If the issue gets worse please come back and rerequest. Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:02, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Highly politicized article with inevitable potential for POV pushing, which has already seen some IP edits be reverted. (Yes, I'm aware there is a current deletion discussion and a current move request for this, but the deletion discussion seems decided on keeping it and the move request wouldn't prevent protection.). O.N.R. (talk) 16:30, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't see much disruption from IPs ... on an article like this there's going to be a lot of well-intended edits that get reverted. Daniel Case (talk) 23:02, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Almost all edits to this page are vandalism and vandalism reverts. RaschenTechner (talk) 18:44, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:18, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:49, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Dr vulpes: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:02, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: POV-pushing/NPOV-violating vandalism related to the handling of January 2025 Southern California wildfires. Requesting temporary semi-protection. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 20:09, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 45 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:51, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Dr vulpes: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:02, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High IP vandalism changing boxoffice figure without reliable source. RangersRus (talk) 20:45, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. If this gets worse please feel free to come back and rerequest, the page has been off of page protection for less than a day. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:54, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Dr vulpes: It has already gone bad after 4 different IPs made bad edits. I already reverted twice the changes that are not sourced. Right now the IP stopped because of the edit it made with wrong boxoffice figure not mentioned in the source. RangersRus (talk) 21:04, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- @RangersRus I've gone ahead and updated the source for the new box office earnings. This was not vandalism, the IP editor probably didn't know how to add sources. Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:26, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Dr vulpes: It has already gone bad after 4 different IPs made bad edits. I already reverted twice the changes that are not sourced. Right now the IP stopped because of the edit it made with wrong boxoffice figure not mentioned in the source. RangersRus (talk) 21:04, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 20:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. If the issue becomes larger please feel free to return and rerequest. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:59, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 185.226.91.6 (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:20, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:03, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Article does not fall under the ArbCom remedies for WP:PIA please see 1.3 Definition of the "area of conflict". If there is continued disruption or vandalism of the article please return and request page protection again. Dr vulpes (Talk) 21:10, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Chronic vandalism especially by IPs, and irresponsible editing and vandalism by accounts. This is especially since this video about the "weirdest wikipedia article ever". I'm not sure if those type of youtubers care that they make a business out of a call to action to brigade Wikipedia with know-it-alls and vandals! Please permanently protect it. Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 21:52, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If it recurs, perhaps go to prolonged pending changes protection. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:55, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism in past weeks. Cabrils (talk) 22:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 5 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:07, 27 January 2025 (UTC) |
| 9 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:26, 27 January 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed. Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required. Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
I’m requesting Autopatrolled rights for my account. I have contributed a significant number of edits, and my contributions are well-sourced and meet notability standards. I believe this rights would help my workflow and reduce the load on reviewers. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
The editor has written 176 articles, with only two being deleted. Their work is well-researched, notable, and meets the encyclopedic standards. Given their track record, I believe they can be trusted to patrol their own articles. Garuda Talk! 13:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit] |
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting confirmed rights: I need it because I'm making an article and need an fair photo Sheagolddigger (talk) 03:36, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the extended confirmed flag. |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit] |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I am editing Wikipedia since 10 months and i had created dozens of articles and also participated in deletion discussions and also nominated some articles for AfD and most of them got deleted. Also i exapanded some articles of stub category and my area of interest are Politics, Rajasthan, BLPs, settlement articles, etc. Now i want to work with other editors on New page reviewing and i am requesting for a one month rights, firstly as a trial. TheSlumPanda (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I am requesting this permission as I would be interested to help at the near-permanent New Pages Feed backlog, when my other work here allows me to do so. I am aware of the relevant content policies and guidelines, especially when it comes to NPOV and BLP. If granted, I intend to use it responsibly, like I do with my other permissions. As for my own record, I have created over 600 articles so far, with few deleted. I already have autopatrolled and rollback permissions. As for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 13:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting NPR rights to help maintain the quality of new pages and ensure Wikipedia’s standards. I will handle this role responsibly. I understand Wikipedia’s notability, verifiability, and content policies like WP:NPOV and reliable sourcing. I’m also aware of the need to prevent spam, promotional content, and poorly sourced articles. Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 06:59, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello I am interested in contributing more to wikipedia. I've been editing pages for about 8 years. I can edit in Croatian and Ukrainian as well. Barrettsprivateers (talk) 18:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Due to the inactivity the rights were revoked, would like to reinstate these rights. Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 06:00, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Requesting to extend my NPP flag. I enjoyed reviewing redirects and articles. Thanks GrabUp - Talk 07:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
I have had page mover temporarily since November 2024. I believe I have made good use of it, and since it will expire automatically in a week I am here to request it be extended. I have handled around eighty requests at WP:RM/TR link and closed a few RMs. As far as I remember, the only conflict was about my close of an RM at Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (discussion can be found on my Talk page). Toadspike [Talk] 17:32, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
I think I meet all the criteria, I have been an editor for more than 6 months, I have over 3000 edits, I have participated in more than 50 move requests, and I've never been blocked. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Recently active back at RM for the past three months after being extremely active many years ago. I was brought to MR twice in 2013 & 2015 and in both cases my closure was endorsed. I have !voted recently in most of the recent months of MR and always aligned with consensus. Spent the last three months getting reacquainted with the changes in policy and approaches to RM's and have started to perform some closures. Would appreciate the bit to help reduce the need for CSD#G6 and/or RM/TR to complete some of these moves. Thanks! TiggerJay (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
I mainly edit articles on biology, particularly fishes. I frequently (over 300 times so far, I am told) have to request a move of the only species in a monotypic genus from the species name to the genus name,as per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA, over a redirect, and would like to be able to do this without having to request a move. Quetzal1964 (talk) 12:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Requesting pending changes reviewer rights to assist in recent changes patrol, am very active on the English Wikipedia and have good knowledge of Vandalism policy and other basic content policies. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm very active on Wikipedia, with over 2,100 edits, and I'm well acquainted with WP:VAND and what vandalism is not. I can contribute to reducing backlogs by reviewing pending changes. Mr.Hanes |
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I’m requesting rollback tool to help with vandalism fighting more effectively. I’ve been active in counter-vandalism work and have a good understanding of policies like WP:VAND and WP:AGF. While I’ve made mistakes in the past, I’ve taken the feedback onboard, slowed down, and focused on making more accurate judgements. Rollback would allow me to handle clear vandalism more efficiently without cluttering edit histories. I’m committed to using it responsibly and only for obvious cases of vandalism, leaving more complex issues for discussion or reporting. Thank you for considering my request. Footballnerd2007 • talk ⚽ 17:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
I am re-requesting rollback after being denied around the end of December for not being consistent enough in RC patrol to meet the criteria. I understand that now and have come back with hopefully having reverted obvious and blatant vandalism more consistently over the past month. As always, I assume good faith, and when it comes to recent changes, if I see something that I'm not quite sure is vandalism or not, I won't undo it. I am well-versed in the different warning templates and when to use each one, and I know when it is appropriate to report to WP:AIV. Rollback will help me quickly undo the very obvious and problematic vandalism that I might catch on RC. Fishy-Finns (talk) 19:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |
I am at about 70,000 edits aross all Wiki projects.
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Minor edits make a major difference. —Gaff ταλκ 04:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Ahh, a sigh of relief from IvoShandor to Rmhermen, thanks for your work on articles related to the Black Hawk War. IvoShandor 05:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC) |
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is for that quick and poisonous work you did on the Ayina River. Yours sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:52, 15 November 2010 (UTC) |
Templates I use often but never remember
[edit]- {{NorthAmNative}} {{WikiProject Michigan}} {{WikiProject Protected areas}} {{river}}
- (Wikipedia:Template_messages/Image_namespace)
- {{fact}}{{no license}} {{no source}} {{or-fu-re|Image:replacementimage}} {{Orphaned fairuse not replaced or {{or-fu-nr}} *{{PD-USGov-Interior-NPS}} {{subst:deletedpage}} {{globalize/USA}}{{intro-missing}}
 |
WP:AIV |  |
WP:ANI |  |
WP:NPP |  |
WP:RPP |  |
WP:RFR |  |
WP:AFD |  |
WP:XFD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
CAT:CSD |  |
WP:CSD |  |
WP:RM |  |
WP:RAA |  |
WP:DR |  |
WP:TM |  |
WP:TT | ||||||
 |
WP:RCU |  |
WP:LOP |  |
CAT:AB |  |
WP:BS |  |
WP:RD |  |
WP:NFC |  |
WP:IUP |
Help box by Jennavecia (talk · contribs)
"Do you want to take a survey?"
[edit]On Feb. 12, 2005, I did a random pages survey. Out of 100 random pages, only 1 was a U.S. town. That's progress. Three towns in the UK, 1 in Spain and 1 in Portugal also turned up. Overall biographies were the largest category at 22%, followed by geography with 15% total. Then Lists at 7%, Disambiguation pages at 6%.
On Feb. 24, 2006, I repeated the 100 random page survey, this time getting 5 U.S. towns. Overall, geography had 26%, biography 21%, fiction 9%, music 4%, colleges 4%, lists 3% and disambigs 4%. Clearly geography and biography are our largest areas. Music, science and business scored less than I expected. Non-individual History was hardly discernable.
Even by Feb. 2005, 100 out of almost 500,000 was not statistically significant but was as much as I had patience for.
Wikiprojects I am a member of:
[edit]- Wikipedia:WikiProject Protected areas
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Space missions
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Michigan
Short To Do list
[edit]- add maps to cities in Chad
- have done ten largest plus A-Biltine (plus Doba, Faya-Largeau, Goz Beïda, Guéréda, Mao, Ouara) from List of cities in Chad
- sources for Hook and Cod wars
- History of camping
- User:Rmhermen/sandbox
- reduce repetition between Chemical Weapons Convention, Chemical weapon proliferation, Destruction of chemical weapons, Chemical weapon#Disposal and Chemical warfare
- Pueblo Chemical Depot - full destruction in Sept 2016
- Joan Walsh Anglund
Early Anon work, no need to bug the developers
[edit]Up to Dec 16, 2003, all the edits at these anonymous id's were mine (59 edits):
- User:64.152.154.140
- User:64.152.153.104
- User:166.90.233.102
- User:65.25.234.xxx
- User:64.7.163.180
- User:64.152.153.139
- User:63.212.148.98
- User:64.152.159.57
- User:64.152.154.147
More recently 1,250 or so edits on 75.41.110.200 are apparently all mine. Apparently my new ID is 75.41.109.190. There are undoubtedly many others as the earliest history of many articles was not preserved by the software.
List of most of my original pictures and some maps
[edit]For copyright declaration purposes The following photographs and diagrams on Wikipedia were taken by and uploaded by me and released under GNU-FDL:
- Update March 21, 2006 by searching with Interiot's Tool (no longer updated - [5] does edit counts though)
Pictures
[edit]
Maps
[edit]- Image:Michigan map.png
- Image:Toledo Strip.png
- Image:Les Cheneaux Islands.PNG
- Image:Blackfeet Indian Reservation map.PNG
- Image:1999_west_nile_map.png, and the others in article
- Image:US execution methods.png
- Image:Lake of Egypt.PNG - an unimproved map
- Image:Upper Peninsula of Michigan.png
Numerous locator maps for U.S. national parks like Image:LocMap Big Bend National Park.png and Image:LocMap Tongariro National Park.png - most now replaced by dynamic map system
